|
Sponsors |
|
|
 |
02-15-2006, 02:38 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
confusion about ditra and unmodified mortar
Got a quick question about installing Ditra membrane. I've used modified thinset to stick the Ditra to my ply floor. I'm now to use unmodified thinset to bond the ceramic tiles to the Ditra. Schluter says that the unmodified mortar is needed because: Latex-modified mortars must air dry for the polymers to coalesce and form a hard film in order to gain strength. When sandwiched between two impervious materials such as Schluter -DITRA and ceramic tile, including porcelain tile, drying takes place very slowly through the open joints in the tile covering. [Might take from 14 to 60 days to cure.]
[But] Portland cement-based unmodified thin-set mortars are dependent on the presence of moisture for hydration in order to gain strength. Since Schluter -DITRA is impervious, it does not deprive the mortar of its moisture. This allows the cement to properly hydrate, resulting in a strong, dense bond coat. In fact, after the mortar has reached final set (usually within 24 hours), unmodified thin-set mortars achieve higher strengths when cured in continually moist conditions.
My question concerns the unmodified thinset. When I look at the mortar specs, none of them say anything about bonding to polyethylene, the stuff that Ditra's made of. And there are substantial warnings about making sure you use latex additives if you want to bond to exotic things like vinyl, linoleum, etc. Maybe there's no bonding at all -- maybe the mortar is instead grabbing those little square cutouts in the Ditra.
Should I worry? Or should I just plow ahead with straight unmodified mortar?
Many thanks ... the expert advice from this forum is terrific!
Don
|
|
|
02-15-2006, 02:44 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Joisey
Posts: 5,217
|
Don --
All of those square recesses in the Ditra are shaped like dovetails -- wider at the bottom than at the top. The thinset mechanically locks into those spaces and holds firm.
And although Schluter insists on unmodified thinset over Ditra some of the pros here have found that lightly modified thinsets (like Custom's VersaBond) work over Ditra, too.
__________________
jeff
Go Rutgers!
|
|
|
02-15-2006, 02:51 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LaConner, Washington
Posts: 13,694
|
Don, here is a cross-section drawing depicting the Ditra cavities that lock the thinset mortar into place. Nothing is actually going to stick to Ditra, mechanical bond only.
Last edited by Mike2; 02-15-2006 at 07:24 PM.
|
|
|
02-15-2006, 02:57 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
Thanks, Jeff and Mike. I had no idea that there was no chemical bonding going on at all. I'll get on with it as soon as the wind-chill is above the single digits.
Don
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 08:03 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 64
|
I have to say, this is the first I have heard of the spec to use unmod'd thinset on the DITRA. I have done three floors with DITRA, one using the older ribbed version about 4 years ago, and 2 using the newer grid version. I used CBP premium Flexbond for all three and they are rock solid after all this time.
Since I am a DIYer, I rarely get to grout until a week or two after setting the tile, so that may have inadvertently helped in the curing, but I honestly read everything I could find about DITRA and never saw this mentioned two years ago when I did my last floor. In fact the video on their site used to show the fellow using apparently the same bucket of thinset for laying the DITRA and then tiling.
Is this relatively new?
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 10:17 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 30,274
|
Un-modified thinset has been in the Ditra installation handbook since 2004.
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 11:59 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 64
|
Ok, well that explains it. My installations were clearly before that. Schluter must have learned something to lead them to change the spec.
I have to add, though, that the bond strength of unmod'd thinset would be considerably less, especially for porcelain tiles, at least accoring to the data sheets for those products. Interesting tradeoff it would seem.
So, now if I use a waterproofing membrane on top of CBU, will the same issues be present? Should those installations also use unmodified thinset?
Alternatively, if I wait, say 30 days, between setting and grouting, does that change the equation and make mod'd thinset more acceptable?
On the other hand, since all cementitious products, including grout, are permeable, then why wouldn't the whole installation (thinset, tile, and grout)eventually cure properly anyway, even with modified thinset? Cetainly the water will evaporate eventually, yes (assuming I do not seal it for 30 days or so)?
Just some thoughts on my part. I am sure I am missing something. I am no chemist, that's for sure.
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 01:34 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 484
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike2
Don, here is a cross-section drawing depicting the Ditra cavities that lock the thinset mortar into place. Nothing is actually going to stick to Ditra, mechanical bond only.

|
If the top layer is impervious and the bottom layer is impervious and the dovetails mechaincally bond the thinset to the bottom layer then what bonds the thinset to the flat top layer?
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 03:05 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LaConner, Washington
Posts: 13,694
|
Good question max. Ditra has an anchoring fleece laminated to its underside. This fleece becomes fully engaged in the thinset mortar forming another mechanical bond.
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 03:10 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 64
|
Thanks, Mike2. I had no idea. Should have thought to do a search. Very good discussions.
|
|
|
02-16-2006, 03:47 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
Mike, thanks for the pointers to those other threads. I have searched this forum for hours and felt that I had seen every pertinent post. But I had not seen any of those. Very useful. And it's also useful to see that there can be valid differences of opinions between the experts.
Don
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 03:43 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 484
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike2
Good question max. Ditra has an anchoring fleece laminated to its underside. This fleece becomes fully engaged in the thinset mortar forming another mechanical bond.

|
I am referring to the bond between the tile and the thinset. The bottom is Ditra which is impervious but the dovetails provide a mechanical bond. On the top their might be glass or porcelain which is also impervious but their is no dovetail. What is providing the bond to the tile? The manufacturers of those products recommend using latex to insure a good bond.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 03:50 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Joisey
Posts: 5,217
|
In post #22 of the first thread Mike posted links to Dave Gobis addresses the porcelain and dryset issue.
Glass would be another story.
__________________
jeff
Go Rutgers!
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 04:36 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Related questions today in another thread
Was most interested in the discussion in this thread as farther down in the posts on today's forum threads I posted a directly related question - please see my post on the 2nd page of the thread under title "masonite subfloor concern" by AnnieKay. Your points about pros having their different ways of proceeding may apply? Would appreciate very much your wisdom on this, all who weighed in, Thanks, Annie (I have e-mailed Schluter but haven't yet received a reply)
|
|
|
 |
 
 
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.
|
|
|