Ceramic Tile Advice Forums - John Bridge Ceramic Tile

Welcome to John Bridge / Tile Your World, the friendliest DIY Forum on the Internet


Advertiser Directory
JohnBridge.com Home
Buy John Bridge's Books

Go Back   Ceramic Tile Advice Forums - John Bridge Ceramic Tile > Tile & Stone Forums > Professionals' Hangout

Sponsors


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Unread 03-30-2021, 06:38 PM   #1
max 93
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Big Bend, WI
Posts: 48
Is one uncoupling membrane better than another?

I’m looking at a tile floor install that is concrete with hydronic heat over Spancrete. The original tile install failed with tiles popping of soon after it was done 25 years ago. Pretty sure it was caused by the shrinking of the concrete and no expansion joints anywhere in the concrete or the tile. The customer wants the new tile installed with an uncoupling membrane. What are your thought on Ditra with All Set under the membrane and to install the tile VS Stratamat with 254 to install the membrane and Tri lite to install tile?
__________________
Matt
max 93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Unread 03-30-2021, 07:48 PM   #2
cx
Moderator emeritus
 
cx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 92,984
In response to your thread title, Matt, I can say with authority that don't nobody know.

Some day, when the industry actually develops testing and a standard for those products, we'll be able at least to show you the test results and let you decide which you prefer. Today, all you have to go by is the various manufacturers' claims. And without a standard, there's no way to dispute any of those.

If you're concerned with crack isolation for the new installation, I recommend you look into a good crack isolation membrane. For those there is a standard -ANSI A118.12.

My opinion; worth price charged.
__________________
CX

Y'ALL NEW VISITORS READ THIS HERE!
cx is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-31-2021, 04:00 PM   #3
Nick Drake
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 17
Not a clue on whether either is truly better for crack isolation.

Strata is going to let you use a modified thinset for bonding the tile without an extended cure time with the grace of the manufacture. If it's large porcelain and time is of the job is a factor I'd probably opt strata just for that piece of mind.

Big downside to working on strata, the "hydration vents" in it are pretty uncomfortable on your supporting hand. If it's any sizeable square footage grab a float to rest your hand on when you're prefilling.
__________________
Nick
Nick Drake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Stonetooling.com   Tile-Assn.com   National Gypsum Permabase


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should You Use An Uncoupling Membrane For This? links1979 Tile Forum/Advice Board 16 07-12-2017 05:46 AM
Uncoupling membrane - Blanke Matt Dworak Tile Forum/Advice Board 4 11-03-2016 08:28 PM
Uncoupling Membrane, do I need it ronbo404 Tile Forum/Advice Board 6 11-19-2013 06:58 PM
re: uncoupling membrane question gramps Tile Forum/Advice Board 8 11-13-2013 07:22 PM
Uncoupling membrane CNM DESIGN Tile Forum/Advice Board 13 02-23-2010 10:20 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Sponsors

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2018 John Bridge & Associates, LLC