|
Sponsors |
|
|
 |
08-25-2018, 02:31 PM
|
#1
|
Moderator -- Wisconsin Kitchen & Bath Remodeler
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oak Creek, WI
Posts: 22,362
|
Skylight rough opening width dimension?
I’ve been looking at skylights for a house with 24” O.C. roof trusses.
And I am puzzled at the manufacturer’s offerings that include both a 21.5” and 22.5” rough opening width measurement. If you’ve got 24” O.C. trusses, for example, you’d have a maximum rough opening width of 22.5”. Why do the companies offer a 21.5” width, as well? I’m missing the reason for this narrower width.
|
|
|
08-25-2018, 02:41 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,104
|
3x trusses? Or I-joists with 3x flanges?
Cheers, Wayne
__________________
Wayne
|
|
|
08-25-2018, 05:27 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas, Ozark Mountains
Posts: 11,741
|
In case the framers were hungover from the night before.
__________________
Kevin
The top ten reasons to procrastinate:
1.
|
|
|
08-26-2018, 08:17 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 91,854
|
If they offered only the 21 1/2" size, Goldstein, I'd be inclined to go with Kevin's thinking that it would be to accommodate poorly placed framing members, but if they also offer a 22 1/2" size, I'd hafta discount that thinking somewhat.
Can't go with Wayne's thinking on accounta with a 3x member you'd need a 21" unit or a 20 1/2" if the 3x was nominal. Perhaps you're in an area where full 2" engineered members are common for roof rafters? Either LVLs or I-Joist type? Be a PITA to finish out if they used the I-Joists, though.
Bottom line? I dunno.
|
|
|
08-26-2018, 08:25 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CX
Can't go with Wayne's thinking on accounta with a 3x member you'd need a 21" unit or a 20 1/2" if the 3x was nominal.
|
The OP referred to rough opening width, not frame size. And a 21.5" RO width is what you'd get with nominal 3x framing at 24" o.c.
Cheers, Wayne
__________________
Wayne
|
|
|
08-26-2018, 09:20 AM
|
#6
|
Moderator emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 91,854
|
Yeah, 21 1/2" is what I meant, Wayne. Old fingers mistake is what I'll claim.
|
|
|
08-27-2018, 07:59 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator -- Wisconsin Kitchen & Bath Remodeler
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oak Creek, WI
Posts: 22,362
|
I need to make a correction. The smaller rough opening width is 21".
Around these parts, everything I've seen in residential is either nominal 2x roof trusses or 2x rafters.
Being a weekday, the company was open and I talked to tech support. And their response was, "The 21" width has been a traditional width for more than 70 years'.
Thanks, all.
|
|
|
08-27-2018, 09:01 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 91,854
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldstein
"The 21" width has been a traditional width for more than 70 years'.
|
Mmmm, that must be Wisconsonian for "I dunno."
|
|
|
08-28-2018, 11:43 AM
|
#9
|
Mudmeister
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rosanky, Texas
Posts: 68,126
|
The tradition might go back to when 2x4s were actually two by four inches, and some were a little more. A 21 inch skylight would allow for a little slop.
|
|
|
09-09-2018, 01:43 PM
|
#10
|
builder, anti-builder, rebuilder -- Retired Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: oahu
Posts: 13,164
|
may have to do with the way 1/2" drywall finishes up under the skylite.
__________________
dana
"the road to hell is paved with osb, mastic, pre-mixed latex 'grout' or 'thinset', "
|
|
|
 |
 
 
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.
|
|
|