View Single Post
Old 11-01-2017, 12:33 PM   #12
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 980
Hi Steve,

Regarding the double member, my initial concerns are abated. Briefly, the common joists have a tributary width of 16" (assuming 16" o.c.). With a six foot span to the foundation wall, the double member has a tributary width of 44" (half of 6' plus half of 16"). So it is carrying 2.75 times the load of a common joist.

As such, my initial impression was that it should be triple a common joist. But since it is composed of engineered full dimension members, each member definitely has a higher capacity that the common joists. Plus the common joists may not be loaded to full capacity. Therefore, it seems likely that the double member has adequate capacity.

Cheers, Wayne
wwhitney is offline   Reply With Quote